Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn moves. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn moves. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Tư, 1 tháng 5, 2013

ADM moves to acquire Australia's GrainCorp

DECATUR, Ill. (AP) -- Archer Daniels Midlands Co. said Wednesday it is moving forward with a bid to acquire the remaining 80 percent of Australian grain handler GrainCorp Ltd that it doesn't already own.

ADM said it is offering 12.20 Australian dollars ($12.63) a share in cash for the stake, giving all of GrainCorp a value of AU$3.4 billion.

ADM's two previous offers for GrainCorp were rejected as too low. ADM said GrainCorp's board has agreed to recommend the latest offer to shareholders for approval, unless it receives a better bid.

GrainCorp offers grain storing, collection and transport. Archer Daniels said the deal will expand its agriculture offerings in the Middle East, Africa and Asia.

ADM has been looking to invest in overseas suppliers and Australia is a major exporter of commodities, including iron ore and wheat.

It will pay for the acquisition with a combination of operating cash and debt.

ADM shares fell 8 cents to $33.50 in after-hours trading.


View the original article here

Thứ Hai, 11 tháng 3, 2013

Mexico moves against TV, telephone tycoons

MEXICO CITY (AP) — President Enrique Pena Nieto on Monday proposed an overhaul of the weak and chaotic regulations that have allowed the world's richest man and the largest Spanish-language media empire to exert near-total control of Mexico's lucrative telephone and television markets.

The reforms, if approved, would give Mexico the tools to take on two of the two most influential men in Mexico, multibillionaire telephone tycoon Carlos Slim and Televisa CEO Emilio Azcarraga, independent observers said. The two rivals' holds on their respective markets have become widely seen as emblems of regulatory dysfunction in a country aspiring to join the ranks of the world's economic superpowers.

It was not clear, however, if the government would actually use any new powers against companies whose pervasive influence has repelled years of efforts to break their control.

The reform "envisages specific measures to accelerate competition in telecommunications and broadcasting," Pena Nieto said before the proposal was signed by the leaders of the country's major parties.

"The purpose of these measures is to free the potential of the sector, and do it in the fastest time possible."

The reforms would create two new national television channels and form an independent regulatory commission along the lines of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission with the power to unilaterally punish non-competitive practices, including withdrawing corporations' licenses.

The existing commission has no ability to alter permits or issues fines, powers that sit with a Cabinet secretary, a position that in the past frequently has been accused of bowing to telecommunications firms.

The reforms would require TV networks to provide their programming free to most cable operators, and require cable operators to carry all broadcast channels, measures seen as essential for opening television markets to competition. The changes would also block telecommunications and broadcasting companies from freezing regulatory decisions indefinitely simply by obtaining a private injunction, a particularity of Mexican law that has thwarted dozens of attempts to regulate media and communications firms.

The changes to the constitution and federal telecommunications laws must now be approved by congress and half of Mexico's 32 state legislatures.

"It seems, at the start at least, like they're taking up substantial issues in order to make structural changes in the way telecommunications and broadcasting work in this country," said Aleida Calleja, president of the Mexican Association for the Right to Information, a group that has campaigned for stricter regulation and increased diversity in the telecoms and television markets. "It seems to me like it's an extremely valuable start."

Televisa's political influence has also become one of the rallying cries of the Mexican left, which often accuses the conglomerate of trading positive coverage of politicians for favorable regulatory treatment. Pre-election protests against Pena Nieto focused on his ties to Televisa, a historic ally of his Institutional Revolutionary Party, which ruled Mexico for seven decades before losing the presidency in 2000.

Pena Nieto has spent his first 100 days reasserting the power of Mexico's once-imperial presidency, most dramatically jailing the head of the teacher's union in the midst of a fight over reforms to the country's sclerotic education system.

Backers of the new reform and some independent experts cast it as a similar blow against entrenched special interests, pledging that it would open Mexico's multi-billion dollar a year telecommunications business to true competition that would drive down some of the world's highest prices for telephone service and diversify a television market dominated by a single company.

"The rules of the game will be fairer, above all for the small and medium companies that have been tied down in their efforts to develop and expand their businesses by the monopolistic practices of Carlos Slim and the television company, particularly Televisa," said Gabriel Sosa Plata, a researcher and telecommunications expert at the Metropolitan Autonomous University in Mexico City.

Slim's Telmex, the privatized former national phone company, controls 80 percent of Mexican landlines and 70 percent of the mobile-phone market. Azcarraga's Televisa has 70 percent of the broadcast TV market and more than 45 percent of cable television.

Televisa said in a written statement that, "We welcome the proposed constitutional reform, which will promote competition in broadcasting and telecommunications." Telmex did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Slim's companies have maintained profit margins nearly double the average in the 34-nation Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, while Mexico has the group's lowest rate of telecommunications investment per capita and sat at or near the bottom in terms of number of fixed and mobile phone lines per capita, according to a scathing OECD report last year.

The report, much of which was fiercely disputed by Slim, found that what it called the dysfunction in telecommunications cost the Mexican economy more than $30 billion a year.

Stock in Televisa was down slightly by mid-afternoon while Slim's America Movil dropped more than 2 percent.

The new regulator's ability to potentially force companies to sell assets in order to reduce their market power and avoid withdrawal of their licenses is "a pretty powerful tool and certainly unlike anything Mexico's ever seen before," said Christopher King, a telecommunications analyst with investment banking firm Stifel Nicolaus.

He described the reform as "bad news" for both American Movil and Televisa, but cautioned that its true impact would only be seen if and when the reforms passes into law regulators begin to act.

"In terms of how bad the news ultimately is, the devil will be in the details," he said.

Slim's firms have maintained profit margins nearly double the average in the 34-nation Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, while Mexico has the group's lowest rate of telecommunications investment per capita and sat at or near the bottom in terms of number of fixed and mobile phone lines per capita, according to a scathing OECD report last year.

The report, much of which was fiercely disputed by Slim, found that what it called the dysfunction in telecommunications cost the Mexican economy more than $30 billion a year.

____

Follow Michael Weissenstein on Twitter at http://twitter.com/mweissenstein

____

Galia Garcia-Palafox contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 10 tháng 3, 2013

Kenyan church moves past painful election history

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — The Rev. Joshua Kimuyu pointed where his church floor is broken and black, a scar from an attack five years old. More than 200 young men armed with crude weapons stormed the Africa Inland Church in Nairobi's sprawling Kibera slum and set a generator on fire.

The explosion tore through the roof, creating one of the most visible scenes of postelection violence after Kenya's disputed election of 2007.

The dark spot is a constant reminder of the church's vulnerability during national elections. But for Kimuyu there was no question of keeping its doors shut this Sunday, the day after Kenya's election commission announced the winner of the East African country's fiercely contested presidential election. This time, Kimuyu said, there was nothing to fear after the two leading candidates —winner Uhuru Kenyatta and loser Raila Odinga —pleaded for calm and unity.

"When presidential candidates spoke to the media, they kind of fueled the steam in the people," he said, looking back on the disputed election of 2007, when more than 1,000 people died in tribe-on-tribe violence. But this time, although the election was hotly contested and close, the candidates urged Kenyans to respect authority, and that appears to have made a difference, said Kimuyu.

Sunday was a day of peace in Kenya. No violence was reported. Only the most minor of disturbances were reported late Saturday in the hours after Kenyatta was named the winner.

Odinga, who called the election "tainted," vowed to press a case of election irregularities with the Supreme Court. But he asked that Kenyans love one another and remain at peace.

The election commission said Kenyatta, the son of Kenya's founding father, won last Monday's vote with 50.07 percent of ballots. Kenyatta stands accused by the International Criminal Court of helping direct some of the 2007-08 postelection violence in which tribes attacked each other with machetes and bows and arrows and the police shot protesters.

Five years ago, President Mwai Kibaki was hurriedly sworn in for a second term, even as Odinga said the election had been stolen. His supporters took to the streets.

At the time, the Africa Inland Church was targeted because it was believed to be patronized by the Kamba tribesmen of Vice President Kalonzo Musyoka, whose willingness to serve in Kibaki's government was seen as a betrayal by the opposition.

In the wake of the 2007-08 violence Kenyans passed a new constitution. That document says that President-elect Kenyatta cannot be sworn in before the court rules on the petition Odinga says he will file. If the court rules that Kenyatta did not cross the 50 percent mark, then Kenyans will vote in a run-off election between the top two finishers.

For Kimuyu this is tremendous progress from five years ago, when Odinga called for mass action.

"I think this is one of the things that have changed since the last election," Kimuyu said. "Odinga is an advocate of the new constitution."

In the run-up to this election, clerics and activists held rallies that preached peace and unity no matter the election result. That investment seems to have paid off, with some of the most hardened Odinga supporters saying he should concede for the sake of the country.

In the Kibera slum, an Odinga stronghold that saw some of the worst violence after the 2007 election, residents went about their business on Sunday morning. Stalls were open, and some young men even seemed more animated by European football than by the outcome of the election. In Kimuyu's church a choir sang as he got ready to deliver a sermon that he said would focus on what it means to be a responsible, lawful citizen.

"We never talk politics here," said Ericson Munyao, a long-time member of the church who was among the first to witness the 2008 attack. "We just tell them to vote wisely, not who to vote for. We simply preach peace."


View the original article here

Kenya church moves past painful election history

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — The Rev. Joshua Kimuyu pointed where his church floor is broken and black, a scar from an attack five years old. More than 200 young men armed with crude weapons stormed the Africa Inland Church in Nairobi's sprawling Kibera slum and set a generator on fire.

The explosion tore through the roof, creating one of the most visible scenes of postelection violence after Kenya's disputed election of 2007.

The dark spot is a constant reminder of the church's vulnerability during national elections. But for Kimuyu there was no question of keeping its doors shut this Sunday, the day after Kenya's election commission announced the winner of the East African country's fiercely contested presidential election. This time, Kimuyu said, there was nothing to fear after the two leading candidates —winner Uhuru Kenyatta and loser Raila Odinga —pleaded for calm and unity.

"When presidential candidates spoke to the media, they kind of fueled the steam in the people," he said, looking back on the disputed election of 2007, when more than 1,000 people died in tribe-on-tribe violence. But this time, although the election was hotly contested and close, the candidates urged Kenyans to respect authority, and that appears to have made a difference, said Kimuyu.

Sunday was a day of peace in Kenya. No violence was reported. Late Saturday, only the most minor of disturbances were reported in the hours of after Kenyatta was named the winner.

Odinga, who called the election "tainted," vowed to press a case of election irregularities with the Supreme Court. But he asked that Kenyans love one another and remain at peace.

The election commission said Kenyatta, the son of Kenya's founding father, won last Monday's vote with 50.07 percent of ballots. Kenyatta stands accused by the International Criminal Court of helping direct some of the 2007-08 postelection violence in which tribes attacked each other with machetes and bows and arrows and the police shot protesters.

Five years ago, President Mwai Kibaki was hurriedly sworn in for a second term, even as Odinga said the election had been stolen. His supporters took to the streets.

At the time, the Africa Inland Church was targeted because it was believed to be patronized by the Kamba tribesmen of Vice President Kalonzo Musyoka, whose willingness to serve in Kibaki's government was seen as a betrayal by the opposition.

In the wake of the 2007-08 violence Kenyans passed a new constitution. That document says that President-elect Kenyatta cannot be sworn in before the court rules on the petition Odinga says he will file. If the court rules that Kenyatta did not cross the 50 percent mark, then Kenyans will vote in a run-off election between the top two finishers.

For Kimuyu this is tremendous progress from five years ago, when Odinga called for mass action.

"I think this is one of the things that have changed since the last election," Kimuyu said. "Odinga is an advocate of the new constitution."

In the run-up to this election, clerics and activists held rallies that preached peace and unity no matter the election result. That investment seems to have paid off, with some of the most hardened Odinga supporters saying he should concede for the sake of the country.

In the Kibera slum, an Odinga stronghold that saw some of the worst violence after the 2007 election, residents went about their business on Sunday morning. Stalls were open, and some young men even seemed more animated by European football than by the outcome of the election. In Kimuyu's church a choir sang as he got ready to deliver a sermon that he said would focus on what it means to be a responsible, lawful citizen.

"We never talk politics here," said Ericson Munyao, a long-time member of the church who was among the first to witness the 2008 attack. "We just tell them to vote wisely, not who to vote for. We simply preach peace."


View the original article here